Periodic Meshing In Universe

This Boltzmann’s import-export-import-export; entropy-syntropy entropy syntropy, cosmically complementary, human-heart-like, eternally pulsative, evolutionary regeneration system, also locally manifests itself in the terrestrial biosphere as the ever alternatively, omni-inter-pulsing, barometric highs and lows of the weather.

As an instance of chasm-spanning between science and the humanities by conceptually transformative energy-quanta accounting, synergetics conceptually elucidates the Boltzmann import-export, entropy-syntropy transaction and the elegant manner in which nature accommodates the “hidden ball” play of now-you-see-it-now-you-don’t energy transference.

Pattern Sorting and Observing:

When we are able to observe for long enough periods of time, we find all the gears of Universe eventually meshing, though not simultaneously. The next periodic meshing of any two of the gears might take a thousand years or 28 l/2 years or 17 seconds. The important phenomenon to note is that there are great varieties of periods of non-meshing which altogether make the physically observed totality appear to take up ever more room, and anywhere within this expansiveness the locally predominant events occurring within short spans of time appear to be Omni-disorderly. When we compound that realization with the now-known million-fold greater span of electromagnetic reality and the lesser span of direct-sense ranging of the human organism, we begin to comprehend how readily humanity falls into the trap of dismay, fear, and negativism in general. Impatience engenders further myopically disorderly incrementation of information receipts. Those who are impatient for the receipt of the next news broadcasts are only beguiled by negative information. That is what myopia looks for. Chronic short-sightedness spontaneously seeks and tunes in only the broadcast entropy. Syntropy incasts, in contradistinction to entropic broadcast. Syntropy can be apprehended only through overall or comprehensive review of the totally recalled information of long-term experience.

Man has no experimental data to suggest that energy is ever created or destroyed. Though our own overall experience leads us to the discovery of cyclic events that return upon themselves, the local, momentary, physical events seem to be giving off energy and taking up more room despite our own syntropic attempts to re-establish local order. Entropy is defined as the law of increase of the random element. But our experience in physical exploration also reveals to us that every pattern phenomenon has its complementary which is rarely a mirror-image and is most frequently invisible. As the complementary has the effect of cosmic integrity balancing, we realize there must be unseen syntropic events of Universe that are always reordering the environment. Syntropy (IN Gravity) is the law of elsewhere-importing and always-orderly regrouping of the entropic (OUT Radiation) exportings of all dying systems. Aging and death here engender birth and growth elsewhere

Humans, like the honeybee, are born ignorant, pre-programmed with hunger, thirst, and respiratory drives to take in chemical elements in crystalline (triple bond Solid), liquid (double bond Non-compressible ), and gaseous( single bond compressible) increments, as well as with pro-creativeness and parental protectiveness drives. With their directly programmed drives humans inadvertently produce (what are to them) side effects, which results in their doing the right cosmic regenerative tasks for all the wrong reasons or without any reason at all.

This preliminary phase of preconditioned human re-flexing, while lasting millions of years, is a gestative-phase -behaviour that becomes obsolete as humans’ metaphysical mind discovers the principles of precession and discovers only through vast, cumulative trial and error the pattern experience of both terrestrial and cosmic ecology; where after humans will progressively recommit their endeavours in support of the recycling and orbitally regenerative effects, precessionally inter-produced by all independently orbiting cosmic systems. This abrupt 90-degree reorientation constitutes the evolutionary stage through which humanity is now passing, wherein humanity will progressively exchange its exclusive preoccupation with self- preservation for that of supporting Omni-inclusive, cosmic integrity.

The function of local-Universe information-gathering and local-Universe problem-solving is a generalized problem-and-solution complex, the solution of which is mathematically expressed as the updated Einstein equation(E=Mc2) E = 2Mc2.

Where E is energy, M is mass, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum.

Recognizing that:

1. This information-gathering and problem-solving function of humans on little, local planet Earth is a cosmically generalized function;
2. Our experiencing of the coordinate integrity of nature’s pattern of initiating the growth of myriads of ecologically inter-complementary biological species is scientifically sorted out; and
3. Nature’s method of trial-and-error evolvement of the successive biological types prospering most successfully under each unique evolutionarily progressive environmental change demonstrates that preferred environment technology eliminates survival only of the fittest;

We come to the full realization that the failures of humans on planet Earth to fulfil satisfactorily and faithfully their generalized information-gathering and local problem solving in support of eternal regeneration of Universe simply means death of this particular planetary installation of mind-endowed individuals. The failure of humans means the function must be performed in local-Universe by other phenomena capable of reliably serving the information agglomerating and problem-solving function. The eternal Universe show must go on.

The reference for this offering is from Buckminster Fuller Synergetics, GRUNCH, Wikipedia, and small bits of tampering by me in brackets – Kelly.

Week One:

Setting the Tuning game of Ephemeralization……Back to Critical Path
IN, OUT, Between or Around it is time declare!!!!!!!!

You have to decide whether you want make money or make sense, because the 2 are mutually exclusive. Page 225 Critical Path RBF
I do not consider it to be money making when I insist upon being refunded for the development and overheads cost of services I perform annually for others, which performance I undertake only in response to the request of others. Page 225
Epistemology: The more we know the more mysterious it becomes that we can and do

Know both aught and naught. The number one a priori characteristic of the entirely mysterious life is awareness which develops gradually into comprehension only to become aware of how inherently little we know. But that little we know or may come to know additionally is ever subject to further vast integral exploration, discovery, differentiation, and comprehension. Synergetics -Richard Buckminster Fuller

Nature is all that we think we do know plus all that we don’t know whether or not we know that we don’t know. Whatever nature permits is natural. If nature does not permit it, it cannot and does not occur. Synergetics -Richard Buckminster Fuller
That there is an a priori unknown is proven by the ever unscheduled, unexpected succession of revelations of additional, theretofore unknown, unconceived-of, generalized principles all of which are discovered and experientially reverifiable as implicit in Universe. It is also retrospectively manifest that this progressively amplifying knowledge, discovered by intuition and mind as constituting eternally operative cosmic relationships, was revealed only because of intuitively pursued, frequent reconsiderations of information complexes redrawn from the ever-recallable special-case experience inventory stored in the humans’ brain neuron bank. All that is known emanated exclusively from the previously unknown.
Synergetics -Richard Buckminster Fuller

Week 2

In reviewing the full range of humans’ presence on earth we discover two main evolutionary trending.
Class one………Class two……….. Evolution.
Class one: evolutionary trending is utterly transcendental to any human vision, planning, manipulation, and corruption. Class -one evolution accounts for humans’ presence on earth. It accounts for their having always been born naked, helpless, for months and inexperienced-ergo, ignorant, hungry, thirsty, curious, and therefore fated to learn how to survive only through trial and error-won, progressive accumulation of experience. Class one evolution accounted for humanity’s all unexpected invention of verbal (aural, sound) communication, and thereby the integration of the experience-won information of the many, where by the integration information of the many increases the capabilities of humanity at large to cope with the exigencies of life.

Week 3

Read pages 225-231 Critical Path
Class Two: Evolutionary trending are all of those events that seem to be resultant upon human initiative-taking or political reforms that adjust to the changes wrought by the progressive introduction of environment-altering artifacts. All of the class two evolutionary events tend to flatter human ego and persuade humanity to deceive itself by taking credit for favorable changes in circumstances while blaming other humans or “acts of god” for unfavorable changes. It is therefore assumes that humanity is running universe wherefore,  if its power structure leaders decide that it is valid to cash in all of natures available riches to further enrich the present rich or to protect them militarily from attacks by their assumed enemies- all at the cost of terminating human presence on planet earth- that is the power-structure leaders’ divine privilege.

—

Most people see that not everything works well in the world and I am often asked: “what can I do about it?”

Comprehensive thinker Bucky Fuller’s drive was to “make the world work for 100% of humanity”; Taking inspiration from an article (The Anticipatory Leader: Buckminster Fuller’s Principles for Making the World Work for 100% of humanity) published in 2006 in The Futurist & written by Medard Gabel & Jim Walker, I have compiled and summarized an easy to read list of Bucky’s leadership principles. This list gathers in one place some of the most important aspects of Bucky Fuller’s thinking and reflections about what a single, seemingly powerless individual can do, and how he or she can get started, to change the course of events humans have unwillingly set unto themselves.

Think comprehensively, act locally:

• Identify the most important thing to do at this extraordinary moment, and do it.
• Zoom out: “spy” the most remote fundamental cause that needs to be changed or revolutionalized. (You can “dig deeper” with the following posts studied previously by The Bucky Call: Start with the Universe, and also this one: Scenario Universe.)
• Change the environment, not the people; that is respect & trust the individual and his decisions.

Anticipate the future:

• Tune in on trends – Technological, world resources, human needs – Tune out the noise.
• Respect LAG & gestation times, understand the second derivative of speed: accelerating acceleration.
• Focus on a vision of what the world should be like; everyone’s basic needs, eternally regenerative, safe from war and social injustice.

Be a “trim tab”, an individual that can initiate big change.

Design and build artifacts that will change the environment and alter Man's behavior and habits

• Be a trim tab, leverage, do more with less. Have faith in the individual’s ability to build artifacts, tools and creative responses that “will move the rudder”.
• Know where the ship is, where it is heading, currents, winds, tides; where the ship ought to be going; when and where to apply pressure.

Take individual initiative:

• See what needs to be done that nobody else is attending to.
• Anti “Big Man”, anti central planning or authority; we all should be leaders, at least of our own lives.

Ask the obvious and naive questions:

• Ask simple and naive questions to initiate change. Why do we do things this way? —we always did it that way!
• With our expanding technical resources, why can’t we commit to feed, clothe and shelter all passengers aboard spaceship earth?
• Why don’t we simply look at how nature builds things, and then build our own structures accordingly?

Do more with less:

• What is wealth? money is not wealth; capital is seeking true productive wealth; wealth that knows how to do more and more with less and less.
• Create more output with less input, gain influence.
• True wealth = resources + know how applied to needs.
• We can only learn more, never less – as knowledge & understanding grows, so does wealth.
• The zero sum game of commodities is scarcity; human creation & ingenuity to do more with less creates abundance. (If you want more information about Malthus and Malthusian Principles, I invite you to read The Bucky Call Darwin Anniversary Special study materials that you can find at: Natural Selection and the Malthusian Principle or Competition for Limited Resources).
• Live off our daily sun generated energy income, not by spending off our balance sheet energy savings (fossil fuels). Understand “cosmic cost accounting”. Measure actual human gains, not financial statements.
• Money is a tool for making artifacts that will make the world work for 100% of humanity.

Seek to reform the environment, not man:

• Change the environment, leverage in infrastructure, not in habit ridden man.
• Reforming the environment will have a large impact on human behavior.

Thank you Dear Reader for reading this far; I kept the last principle of this “Bucky Bucket” list for you, it is now your turn and a “not to be wasted” opportunity for you to:

Solve problems through action:

-Richard Buckminster (Bucky) Fuller.

• What do you see that needs to be done that nobody else is attending to?
  
• What do you need to learn to be effective in attending to it in a highly efficient and inoffensive-to-others manner?
• What problem solving action are you willing to take?

Please consider sharing the thoughts triggered by this article, or the actions and intentions that you have undertook by leaving a comment, this may inspire somebody and, maybe, trigger a “chain reaction” for the benefit of all…

If you are not too sure what you could do at this point, please allow me to suggest one first easy step that you can take right now: It will instantly put you in motion towards awakening your awareness: click on the link to subscribe via RSS or e-mail to receive updates from TheTrimTab.

Other related (hand picked) articles & postings that you may like:

• A Better World Project. We are now 10 years into the 21st century and guess what: Progress? Not at all my dear…
• Opening The Bucky Call To All. Is it reasonable to suspect you are interested in becoming an active part of The Bucky Call?
• The Bucky Call. A study of Critical Path, Bucky’s starting point and road map for a world that works for all.
• Bucky Fuller list of 7 conditions for humanity to change its destiny

The Bucky Call - the behavior of "Universe" can only be shown with a minimum of two pictures. Unity is plural and at minimum two. (Drawings courtesy Mallory Pearce)

321.01 When people say of Universe, “I wonder what is outside its outside?” they are trying to conjure a unitary conception and are asking for a single picture of an infinitely transforming, nonsimultaneous scenario. Therefore, their question is not only unanswerable but unrealistic, and indicates that they have not listened seriously to Einstein and are only disclosing their ignorance of its significance when they boastfully tell you that the speed of light is 186,000 miles per second.

321.02 You cannot get out of Universe. Universe is not a system. Universe is not a shape. Universe is a scenario. You are always in Universe. You can only get out of systems.

(…)

322.01 Universe can only be thought of competently in terms of a great, unending, but finite scenario whose as yet unfilled film strip is constantly selfregenerative. All experiences are terminated, ergo finite. An aggregate of finites is finite. Our Universe is finite but nonsimultaneously conceptual: a moving-picture scenario of nonsimultaneous and only partially overlapping events. One single picture__one frame__does not tell the story. The single-frame picture of a caterpillar does not foretell or imply the transformation of that creature, first, into the chrysalis stage and, much later, into the butterfly phase of its life. Nor does one picture of a butterfly tell the viewer that the butterfly can fly.

The Bucky Call - Telegram sent by Bucky Fuller following the discovery of E-MC2

322.02 In scenarios, you have to have a pretty long sequence run in order to gain any clue at all as to what is going on. You cannot learn what it is all about from a single picture. You cannot understand life without much experience.

323.00 In the endless but finite and never exactly repeating (Heisenberged) “film- strip” scenario of evolutionary Universe, after the film strip has been projected, it goes through a dissolved phase and re-forms again to receive the ever-latest self- intertransforming patterning just before being again projected. The rate of change and the numbers of special-case self-retransformings of physical evolution tend ever to accelerate, differentiate, and multiply; while the rate of change and the numbers of self-remodifyings of generalized law conceptionings of metaphysical evolution tend ever to decelerate, simplify, consolidate, and ultimately unify.

Full text of Synergetics by R. Buckminster Fuller, coutesy of The Estate Of Buckminster Fuller.

The Bucky Call - Scenario Universe

Scenario:

1 scenario
a postulated sequence of possible events; “planners developed several scenarios in case of an attack”
2 scenario
an outline or synopsis of a play (or, by extension, of a literary work)
3 scenario
a setting for a work of art or literature; “the scenario is France during the Reign of Terror”

Etymology:
Italian, from Latin scaenarium place for erecting stages, from scaena stage
1 a: an outline or synopsis of a play ; especially : a plot outline used by actors of the commedia dell’arte b: the libretto of an opera2 a: screenplay b: shooting script3: a sequence of events especially when imagined ; especially : an account or synopsis of a possible course of action or events

1. an outline of the plot of a dramatic work, giving particulars as to the scenes, characters, situations, etc.
2. the outline or the manuscript of a motion picture or television program, giving the action in the order in which it takes place, the description of scenes and characters, etc.
3. an imagined or projected sequence of events, esp. any of several detailed plans or possibilities: One scenario calls for doubling profits by increasing our advertising, the other by reducing costs.

Definitions, thanks to: Wordreference, Merriam Webster, and Dictionary Reference.

Script:

1 script
a particular orthography or writing system
2 handwriting, hand, script
something written by hand; “she recognized his handwriting”; “his hand was illegible”
3 script, book, playscript
a written version of a play or other dramatic composition; used in preparing for a performance
1 script
write a script for; “The playwright scripted the movie”

Etymology:
Middle English, from Latin scriptum thing written, from neuter of scriptus, past participle of scribere to write – more at scribe
1 a: something written : text b: an original or principal instrument or document c (1): manuscript 1 (2): the written text of a stage play, screenplay, or broadcast ; specifically : the one used in production or performance2 a: a style of printed letters that resembles handwriting b: written characters : handwriting c: alphabet3: a plan of action
1. the letters or characters used in writing by hand; handwriting, esp. cursive writing.
2. a manuscript or document.
3. the text of a manuscript or document.
4. the manuscript or one of various copies of the written text of a play, motion picture, or radio or television broadcast.
5. any system of writing.
6. Printing. a type imitating handwriting. Compare CURSIVE.

-verb (used with object)
7. to write a script for: The movie was scripted by a famous author.
8. to plan or devise; make arrangements for: The week-long festivities were scripted by a team of experts.

Definitions, thanks to: Wordreference, Merriam Webster, and Dictionary Reference.

The Bucky Call - The Great Pirates - That one would be "Legally Pigilly!"

This “sovereign–meaning top-weapons enforced‹”national” claim upon humans born in various lands leads to ever more severely specialized servitude and highly personalized identity classification. As a consequence of the slavish “categoryitis” the scientifically illogical, and as we shall see, often meaningless questions “Where do you live?” “What are you?” “What religion?” “What race?” ‘”What nationality?” are all thought of today as logical questions. By the twentyfirst century it either will have become evident to humanity that these questions are absurd and anti-evolutionary or men will no longer be living on Earth. If you don’t comprehend why that is so, listen to me closely.

1. origins of specialization

Obviously we need to pursue further the origins of specialization into deep history, hoping thereby to correct or eliminate our erroneous concepts. Historically we can say that average human beings throughout pre-twentieth-century history had each seen only about one-millionth of the surface of their spherical Earth. This limited experience gave humans a locally-focused, specialized viewpoint. Not surprisingly, humanity thought the world was flat, and not surprisingly humans thought its horizontally extended plane went circularly outward to infinity. In our schools today we still start off the education of our children by giving them planes and lines that go on, incomprehensibly “forever” toward a meaningless infinity. Such oversimplified viewpoints are misleading, blinding, and debilitating, because they preclude possible discovery of the significance of our integrated experiences.

The Bucky Call - Critical Path - The Origins Of Specialization

Under these everyday, knowledge-thwarting or limiting circumstances of humanity, the comprehensively-informed master venturers of history who went to sea soon realized that the only real competition they had was that of other powerful outlaws who might also know or hope to learn through experience “what it is all about.” I call these sea mastering people the great outlaws or Great Pirates-the G. P.’s‹ simply because the arbitrary laws enacted or edicted by men on the land could not be extended effectively to control humans beyond their shores and out upon the seas. So the world men who lived on the seas were inherently outlaws, and the only laws that could and did rule them were the natural laws-the physical laws of universe which when tempestuous were often cruelly devastating. High seas combined with nature’s fog and night-hidden rocks were uncompromising.

The Bucky Call - The Great Pirates, Now Extinct

And it followed that these Great Pirates came into mortal battle with one another to see who was doing to control the vast sea routes and eventually the world. Their battles took place out of sight of landed humanity. Most of the losers went to the bottom utterly unbeknownst to historians. Those who stayed on the top of the waters and prospered did so because of their comprehensive capability. That is they were the antithesis of specialists. They had high proficiency in dealing with celestial navigation, the storms, the sea, the men, the ship, economics, biology, geography, history, and science. The wider and more long distanced their anticipatory strategy, the more successful they became.

But these hard, powerful, brilliantly resourceful sea masters had to sleep occasionally, and therefore found it necessary to surround themselves with super-loyal, muscular but dull-brained illiterates who could not see nor savvy their masters’ stratagems. There was great safety in the mental dullness of these henchmen. The Great Pirates realized that the only people who could possibly contrive to displace them were the truly bright people. For this reason their numberone strategy was secrecy. If the other powerful pirates did not know where you were going, nor when you had gone, nor when you were coming back, they would not know how to waylay you. If anyone knew when you were coming home, “small-timers” could come out in small boats and waylay you in the dark and take you over-just before you got home tiredly after a two-year treasure-harvesting voyage. Thus hijacking and second-rate piracy became a popular activity around the world’s shores and harbors. Thus secrecy became the essence of the lives of the successful pirates; ergo, how little is known today of that which I am relating.

Pick and go to any supermarket or shopping centre and record all the ins, outs, betweens and arounds the event called super market or shopping center. What is being said without saying anything and where did it come from?

Non Simultaneous In, Out, Around, And In-Between

Simultaneously: existing, occurring, or operating at the same time; concurrent: simultaneous movements

Non - simultaneity : not existing, occurring, or operating at the same time; concurrent: simultaneous movements

Synchronously: in synchrony; in a synchronous manner; “in four-chambered hearts, the two auricles move synchronously”

No generalized principles have ever been discovered that contradict other  generalized principles. All the generalized principles are interaccommodative. Some of them are synchronously interaccommodative; that is, some of them accommodate the other by synchronized nonsimultaneity. Many of them are   interaccommodative simultaneously.

Because of the fundamental nonsimultaneity of universal structuring, a single, simultaneous, static model of Universe is inherently both nonexistent and conceptually impossible as well as unnecessary. Ergo, Universe does not have a  shape. Do not waste your time, as man has been doing for ages, trying to think of a unit shape “outside of which there must be something,” or “within which, at center, there must be a smaller something.”

Universe is finite because it is the sum total of finitely furnished experiences. The comprehensive set of all experiences synergetically constituting Universe discloses an astronomically numbered variety of subset event-frequency rates and their respective rates of conceptual tunability comprehension. It takes   entirely different lengths of time to remember to “look up” different names or   facts of past events.

Local life in Universe involves the invention of time. Time involves   nonsimultaneity and limited information__ergo, only partial equatability. By introducing time and the myriad differential of interevent lags consequent to the   exponentially multiplying, reinterpositioning distance variables inherent in the six alternative moves for each of the myriad of differentially frequenced, neversimultaneous events, the exponentially multiplying complexity of interevent lags accounts for both the micronuclear and macroastronomical progressive range of distance differentials of experience-limited, local-Universe human observing. Since each of the only-mathematically-statable, scientifically generalized laws of   physical Universe constitutes a statement of truth, and since science has discovered a plurality of observable and ever redemonstrably operative truths all of which are always omniinteraccommodative__it may be said that truth is  complex.

Thought discovers that we divide Universe into an “outwardness and   inwardness,” so thinking is the first subdivision of Universe, because Universe,   we discovered, was finite. Thinking is a nonsimultaneously recallable aggregate   of inherently finite experiences and finite experience furniture   such as photons of   light. One of the most important observations about our thought is the discovery   that experiences are nonsimultaneous. Nonsimultaneity is a fundamental   characteristic, and if experiences are nonsimultaneous, you cannot have   simultaneous reconsideration.

All the words of all the vocabularies could be said to represent all the   formalized attempts of men to communicate all their experiences. So we could set   out to examine all the dictionaries of the world. We can pick up any one dictionary and discover that it is a nice finite package. We can open one page, but we cannot look at all the words at once. If we cannot look at all the words even on one page, we certainly cannot look at all the words of a whole dictionary at once. It does not make the dictionary infinite because we cannot look at all the words at once or think about all the words at once. The inability to think about everything   at once does not mean that experience or consideration of experience is infinite. It is perplexing that one of the most persistent contemplations of human beings has been predicated on a static concept of Universe, the kind of Universe that went out with classical Newtonian mechanics. We cannot think of Universe as a fixed, static picture, which we try to do when people ask where the outwardness of Universe ends. Humans try to get a finite unit package. We have a monological propensity for the thing, the key, the building block of Universe. What we discover here is that it is not possible to think about all Universe at once. It nonsimultaneously conceptual. This in no way mitigates against its finiteness and thinkableness.

The parents tell the child he cannot have both the Sun and the Moon in the picture at the same time. The child says that you can. The child has the ability to coordinate nonsimultaneity. The parents have lost the ability to coordinate nonsimultaneity. One of our great limitations is our tendency to look only at the static picture, the one confrontation. We want one-picture answers; we want key   pictures. But we are now discovering that they are not available.

We can think about all the experiences progressively and successively. And we can coordinate our thoughts about our experiences. Our very ability to think is such a propensity for the coordination of the reconsiderations of relationships. We do not have to be simultaneous to be interconnected. We can telephone across the international date line from Sunday back to Saturday.

We have had a tendency in our thinking to say that what is finite is statically conceptual as a one-unit glimpse, so we have been seemingly frustrated in trying to understand Universe, which is an omnidirectional experience, and so we feel there ought to be an outwardness of this sphere. That is a static concept. We are not dealing with such a sphere at all, because we have all these nonsimultaneous reports, and all we have is the interconnectedness of the nonsimultaneity. One of Einstein’s most intellectual discoveries was this nonsimultaneity, which he apparently could have come upon by virtue of his experience in examining the thoughts of inventors and their patent claims  regarding timekeeping devices, watches, and clocks. The speed-of-light measurements plus Planck’s quantum mechanics and  Einstein’s relativity showed that Universe is an aggregate of nonsimultaneous events. Their experiments showed that as each of the nonsimultaneous events lost their energy, they lost it to newly occurring events. Thus energy always became 100 percent accounted for.

Synergetics, Bucky Fuller - Gyroscopic Precession

From Cosmography:

With only one restraint, the ball was moving omnidirectionally or multidimensionally. With two restraints, it was moving in a plane; with three restraints, it moves only in a line. I now conclude that it is more probable that I can concentrate all the restraints operating upon me from all the stars because of the multidirectional pull of all the stars actually pulling me. I conclude that there is much redundancy but that four restraints is closer to a matter of reality than three restraints. When we attach a fourth restraint perpendicular to the center of the drumhead and pull it only in the “fro” direction, the ping-pong ball “me” seems at last to be immobilized. With four restraints the ping- pong ball “me” can no longer move either toward or away from any other parts of the Universe. But the ball can twist locally, that is, it can rotate in place around an axis, and that axis itself can incline at many angles, as does the gyroscope top, without alteration of its volumetric center position in respect to the four vertexial star groups. Because the vectors are coming together in nonequilateral quadrangles, i.e., in trapeoids, the restraints are not intertriangulated, and we have learned experimentally that only triangles are stable. (See Sec. 610, Triangulation.) Therefore, it is possible for the ball to “turbine,” rotate, and precess locally in place without altering the geometrical position at volume center of the celestial tetrahedron from whose four corners the four vectors of restraint were imposed. The six edges of the celestial spherical tetrahedron represent the three massattraction restraints imposed on each of the tetrahedron’s four corner mass centers as each being in normal acceleration is precessionally restrained from exiting from Universe. Each of the four corners’ group massiveness is restrained by all three of the other tetrahedral corner mass centers. Any one of the massmoment acceleration tendencies to part company with the others is overpowered three-toone by the three others. Thus the cohering integrity of Universe is manifest to us by consideration of the celestial advantage points from which our four central restraints were mounted. Though the ping-pong “me” ball can be twisted and torqued in place, it cannot be moved from its tetrahedral center position. To prevent local in-position twist and torque, each of the four corner tensional restraints will have to be multiplyingly replaced by three restraints, all springing from three external points at each of the four tetrahedral corners; and each of the three tensions from any one of the four corners must cross the others triangularly and be attached tangentially to the ball at the center. These 12 now completely restrain any motion of the central ball in relation to the other four.

401.05 The six compression members are the acceleration vectors trying to escape from Universe at either end by action and reaction, while the ends of each would-be escapee are restrained by three tensors; while the ball at the center is restrained from local torque and twist by three triangulated tensors from each of the four corners tangentially affixed.

- Bucky Fuller

263.02 Our brains are physical tuning capabilities consisting of uniquely resonant atoms and cells. Apprehension consists of resonant atoms tuning into congruently resonant atoms. There is a cosmic meshingness; an angle-and-frequency congruence similar to that of mechanical gear trains when the number of teeth per circular perimeter and the angular modulation of the valleys and peaks of the individual teeth of the larger, smaller, or unit radius gears must mesh with minimally tolerated aberrational error; wherein the aberrations of metallic gears must be compensatingly interfilled with lubricants that prevent the aberrations of one part from reaching the aberrations of the reciprocating part. In much modern machinery nylon and other plastic gears have provided interyieldability, obviating the use of lubricants. Such yielding is demonstrably employed by nature in the hydraulic-pneumatic, crystalline structuring of all biological organisms. (See Sections 522.36 and 1052.52.)

263.03 Special cases are inherently terminal. Brain, which deals only with special case experiences, each of which is energetically terminal, demands knowledge of how everything begins and ends. But principles are eternal, a word with which the brain is not familiar. All inputs to the brain are finite. We may say that thinking about the truth alters truth, but only to the extent of defining it. We may always clarify and redefine the truth by making it more comprehensively considerate and more incisively exquisite. Truth alters truth only by refining the definition. The substance of the sensing and instrumental control of the physical means of communication is always refinable and tends toward the ephemeralization of doing ever more with ever less, but you can never get to the exact, most economical statement of the truth, for the very communication will have ephemeralized to pure metaphysics. Truths are like generalized principles: interaccommodative and nonintercontradictory. Truths are special case realizations of the generalized principles; by these very aspects are they discovered to be truths.

We have what we refer to as events and novents Experiences are always special case event programs. The special cases of music or noise are temporarily tunably sensed frequencies, of whose message significance we become progressively aware and in between which unsensed, untunable, eternal interrelationships persist. There is no verb for eternity. Verbs are always special case.

In and Out

524.101 There are no specific directions or localities in Universe that may be opposingly designated as up or down. In their place, we must use the words out and in. We move in toward various individual energy-event concentrations, or we move out from them. But the words in and out are not mirror-image opposites. In is a specific direction toward any one local individual system of Universe. Out is not a direction; out is nondirectional because it is anydirectional. 524.11 You are always in Universe. You cannot get out of Universe. All the word out means is that you are not inside a system. You can only get out of systems.

524.12 In designates individual experience foci. Foci are in, because focusable, but always, as entropy shows, temporary. Relationships exist between the ins because they are definable. Out is common to all; out is timeless; out is not really packaged. In is discrete; out is general. The ins are discontinuous; the outs are continuous. Out is nothingness, i.e., nonexperience. Only the nonexperience nothingness constitutes continuum. In is temporal; out is eternal. Ins are knowable; outs are unknowable. In is individually, uniquely identifiable; out, though total, inherently integral, and finite, is nonidentifiable. In is individually, uniquely directional; out is any, all, and no direction. Out is all directions; even when temporarily inward toward center, it passes beyond the center to eventual outness.

263.02 Our brains are physical tuning capabilities consisting of uniquely resonant atoms and cells. Apprehension consists of resonant atoms tuning into congruently resonant atoms. There is a cosmic meshingness; an angle-and-frequency congruence similar to that of mechanical gear trains when the number of teeth per circular perimeter and the angular modulation of the valleys and peaks of the individual teeth of the larger, smaller, or unit radius gears must mesh with minimally tolerated aberrational error; wherein the aberrations of metallic gears must be compensatingly interfilled with lubricants that prevent the aberrations of one part from reaching the aberrations of the reciprocating part. In much modern machinery nylon and other plastic gears have provided interyieldability, obviating the use of lubricants. Such yielding is demonstrably employed by nature in the hydraulic-pneumatic, crystalline structuring of all biological organisms. (See Sections 522.36 and 1052.52.)

263.03 Special cases are inherently terminal. Brain, which deals only with special case experiences, each of which is energetically terminal, demands knowledge of how everything begins and ends. But principles are eternal, a word with which the brain is not familiar. All inputs to the brain are finite. We may say that thinking about the truth alters truth, but only to the extent of defining it. We may always clarify and redefine the truth by making it more comprehensively considerate and more incisively exquisite. Truth alters truth only by refining the definition. The substance of the sensing and instrumental control of the physical means of communication is always refinable and tends toward the ephemeralization of doing ever more with ever less, but you can never get to the exact, most economical statement of the truth, for the very communication will have ephemeralized to pure metaphysics. Truths are like generalized principles: interaccommodative and nonintercontradictory. Truths are special case realizations of the generalized principles; by these very aspects are they discovered to be truths.

We have what we refer to as events and novents.

Experiences are always special case event programs. The special cases of music or noise are temporarily tunably sensed frequencies, of whose message significance we become progressively aware and in between which unsensed, untunable, eternal interrelationships persist. There is no verb for eternity. Verbs are always special case.

In and Out

524.101 There are no specific directions or localities in Universe that may be opposingly designated as up or down. In their place, we must use the words out and in. We move in toward various individual energy-event concentrations, or we move out from them. But the words in and out are not mirror-image opposites. In is a specific direction toward any one local individual system of Universe. Out is not a direction; out is nondirectional because it is anydirectional.

524.11 You are always in Universe. You cannot get out of Universe. All the word out means is that you are not inside a system. You can only get out of systems.

524.12 In designates individual experience foci. Foci are in, because focusable, but always, as entropy shows, temporary relationships exist between the ins because they are definable. Out is common to all; out is timeless; out is not really packaged. In is discrete; out is general. The ins are discontinuous; the outs are continuous. Out is nothingness, i.e., nonexperience. Only the nonexperience nothingness constitutes continuum. In is temporal; out is eternal. Ins are knowable; outs are unknowable. In is individually, uniquely identifiable; out, though total, inherently integral, and finite, is nonidentifiable. In is individually, uniquely directional; out is any, all, and no direction. Out is all directions; even when temporarily inward toward center, it passes beyond the center to eventual outness.

Bruce Lipton, The Biology Of Belief

Signal molecules used by individual cells to regulate their own physiologic functions when released into the environment also influence the behavior of other cells allowing for a co-ordination of behavior among a group of unicellular organisms – allowing them to function as a community. As organisms became more complex specialized cells took over monitoring and organizing the flow of signaling molecules. In humans this has resulted in the brain. Our conscious mind interprets these signals as emotion. There are receptors for these signals not just in the brain, but throughout all tissues of the body allowing for an integrated experience. The mind not only derives emotions through a feedback of the body’s environmental information, the body can use the brain to generate the molecules of emotion and override the system. (psych yourself up or out)

Molecules: The smallest particle of a substance that retains the chemical and physical properties of the substance and is composed of two or more atoms a group of like or different atoms held together by chemical forces.

Physiologic: characteristic of or appropriate to an organism’s healthy or normal functioning

Behavior: The manner in which something functions or operates

Co-ordination: harmonious combination or interaction, as of functions or parts.

Unicellular: Having or consisting of one cell; one-celled

Organisms: An individual form of life that is capable of growing, metabolizing nutrients, and usually reproducing. Organisms can be unicellular or multi-cellular. They are scientifically divided into five different groups (called kingdoms) that include prokaryotes, protists, fungi, plants, and animals, and that are further subdivided based on common ancestry and homology of anatomic and molecular structures.

Subconscious mind is strictly habitual; it will play the same responses to life’s signals again and again. Most reflexes are genetic based instincts. But conditioning (Pavlov’s dogs) can create novel reflex behaviors that become part of the subconscious. Humans have developed areas of the brain advanced enough that we can learn perceptions directly from others. Once our subconscious accepts these truths they become our truths and guide future responses. Our responses to environmental stimuli are controlled by our perceptions, but it’s possible that not all of our perceptions are accurate.

Subconscious: existing or operating in the mind beneath or beyond consciousness: the subconscious self.

Perceptions: Insight, intuition, or knowledge gained by perceiving.

Our Beliefs control Our Biology: Placebo effect vs Nocebo (negative belief that can damage health).

Your beliefs become your thoughts

Your thoughts become your words

Your words become your actions

Your actions become your habits

Your habits become your values

Your values become your destiny

Mahatma Gandhi